Some Pages

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Texas Senator Barton's Apology

Gah, the Daily Show, and America at large, has lost almost all respect in my eyes. I mean this following brilliant statement and the following completely idiotic backlash.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDc0n79BdLs

Everyone is losing their shit over this, and they don't understand what's being said! Barton is right! He's not saying that BP shouldn't have paid money for damages they've caused, suffered for their failures, or even that they shouldn't have to deal with the consequences of their actions. He's not saying the 20 billion was intrinsically wrong as a punishment. If you actually bother to pay attention and think about this, you'd realize that he's following the law and the strictest legitimate interpretation of the Constitution.

If you're confused, and therefore probably not accustomed to thinking, all he's saying is that while BP is without a doubt completely responsible for this colossal environmental fuckup, they were still charged for the $20 billion prior to this very hearing where the apology took place. Why is that bad? Because this was the hearing where Congress was supposed to determine if/how/why/when BP fucked up. They were on trial. He was apologizing for that slush fund because it completely and utterly violated due process. They were being punished and sentenced before being legally proven guilty. This would be like if you were being charged with theft and were forced to pay a fine before your court date.

This is major! Don't you get it? Barton describes it as a shakedown because it's a legitimate criticism. Congress and the Executive branch know very well what a horrible mess BP is in. They have no one on their side. Every single oil exec that was asked to go to this meeting from every other major oil company all said "This spill is all BP and we have much better security measures in place than they do." BP has no friends right now and are completely at the mercy, politically, of the government. Imagine for a second if they bothered to leap to their defense against the 20 billion. How exactly would that impact what little is left of their image? The fund is, of course, being handled independently by an Obama administration official, some dude they call the "pay czar."


*sigh*

I mean, can't you imagine what sort of precedent it sets? Does the government now have the power to take money from anyone who is publicly indefensible? That's why it's a shake down, there's no way to say 'no' without things getting violent. And don't get me wrong, BP is a horrible and atrocious, criminally incompetent cheapskate corporation. They totally fucked up and I hope Congress takes many more billions of dollars from them. I hope they are completely financially crushed and cease to exist. AFTER A BLOODY TRIAL! You know, that THING guaranteed in the Constitution? You might be familiar with the concept, they write TV dramas about them all the damn time.

The really sad part is that he even went out of his way to openly state he wasn't speaking on anyone else's behalf except his own. He divorced himself completely from his party when he made that statement. Not that anyone won't use this as some lame diatribe against those greedy Republicans, but none-the-less, it's really impressive. I mean yes, the Republicans are a horrible, horrible organization full of corruption and racism and homophobia, etcetera. But he went out on a limb with no support and spoke his mind, the legal truth. That's pretty damn honorable. Isn't this the shit we always want to hear about? Isn't this a quality we usually want in our leaders?

Maybe we secretly have a somewhat competent government, and no one notices? Maybe our officials have realized that they can only be elected if they act as stupid as possible?

11 comments:

  1. You'll need to take back that last comment about a competent government; he's been forced to apologize for his apology, with the threat of losing his position if he didn't. Yeah.

    ReplyDelete
  2. How? They can't kick him out if he's elected, right?

    ReplyDelete
  3. He's the top Republican on the energy committee. They can't take his job as senator, but they can get him off the committee.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ahhhh, but of course. Fuck Americans.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "In creating a victims' compensation fund, BP will use noncore U.S. assets as security for its $20 billion obligation. Chief Financial Officer Byron Grote stopped short of calling it a lien, but he said the assets will be used as security. "

    Does this mean that if BP can't come up with a full $20 billion, Mr. Obama gets to seize some of BP's assets? Yet more state take overs of corporations? Gah.

    I was impressed with the Senator though. I saw Republican and then I saw Texas Republican and I thought, "Wow, he acts just like Mr. Roe." Then I thought, "Wait, is he actually making sense? Holy shit!"

    But of course people are outraged. Of course. When someone does something genuinely intelligent in our government, no one interprets it correctly. It's unfortunate that he's been forced into essentially discrediting the original apology.

    Fuck Americans +1.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm all down with the fuck Americans thing, but I think that your analysis of the situation is a bit off Damios. You imply that BP was forced to create that $20B fund legally, before the hearing was over.

    First off, it is a hearing, not a trial.
    Secondly, as far as I can tell, BP was not legally forced to do so, but was pressured to do so by ill-will and Obama (significant) arm-twisting. They are trying to cut their losses here by submitting to public demand. But it is, as I udnerstand, as of this point, still a voluntary action on the part of BP (regardless of the politicking involved), and thus does not violate due process.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Think of it like this. They could have waited until after the hearing, when it would have had more legal force. Or, they could do it now, and be like "look we're cooperating!"

    I take their caving as an admission of guilt -- they actually might believe they owe more than $20B, and think by agreeing to that amount now they can be like "look, we already set aside this huge amount!" when the toll actually starts ticking past $21B.

    ReplyDelete
  8. While that may be true, the President shouldn't be pushing corporations around. If BP wants to try to shape up their image, let them get the idea on their own. Don't force it on them, unless it's through legal channels.

    ReplyDelete
  9. As to the violation of due process...sure. And how about this? Now, any bank robbers can be 'politically pressured' into donating money to the government prior to their hearing. You know, to make sure no paperwork gets lost. Would that be a violation of due process? I guess not if it's still 'voluntary.' But it isn't. BP did something wrong. BP is being punished by the government, but regardless it's doing so via strong arming through non-legal channels. That's violation of due process. They were forced to 'donate' four years worth of revenue into government hands. Four years. To a government who has accomplished nothing during this time except for super soaker fights, golf rounds, and the occasional visit to various political rallies for random third-rate holidays.

    http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/104313-obama-hits-golf-course-with-biden-on-another-hot-humid-weekend

    http://gawker.com/5556730/rahm-emanuel-and-joe-biden-had-a-super-soaker-fight-yesterday

    http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/tue-june-1-2010-arthur-brooks

    In fact, they've been acting as a detriment to the procedure. Dutch corporations offered to send in specialized ships to assist, and the government has refused.

    http://www.rnw.nl/english/article/dutch-oil-spill-response-team-standby-us-oil-disaster

    http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/steffy/7043272.html

    Also, consider gems like this;

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/06/17/stupak_legitimate_for_bp_escrow_account_to_fund_health_care.html

    http://mediamatters.org/research/201006180006

    Oh, and BP is also getting a bunch of that money back, for the record. You know, once the Obama administration is done with it.

    http://www.examiner.com/x-33986-Political-Spin-Examiner~y2010m6d19-BP-oil-spill-clean-up-costs-and-Joe-Barton-slush-fund-give-BP-big-IRS-tax-break

    No, I stand by Senator Barton. There's a good chance I'm voting for him again next election.

    ReplyDelete
  10. And all the same applies to BP. Their CEO was out yacht racing some time ago, recently.

    I dunno. For me, it just boils down to the Johnson method: http://image.absoluteastronomy.com/images/encyclopediaimages/l/lb/lbj-green.jpg

    All presidents do it. All leaders do it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I realize I'm a little late on this but I thought I'd mention that his step son lives in Steiner, goes to CPHS, and I'm pretty good friends with him. I guess this is why he dislikes Jon Stewart so much.

    ReplyDelete